The Fanbase isn't large enough statement is certianly not true. Separating the 2 ?genres? would help. I don't know enough about most of the classic country to answer alot of the ?s. I agree with separating the 2. Like you said they are entirely different from each other. Today's country leans toward being more pop than country. And classic country is all about the oldies. There's history in classic country. and the new stuff just mostly relies on the classics to make it seem country.
I don't feel stupid about any subject. I'm smart enough to know that I don't know much about anything, just my own life experience and what has worked for me. I'm also smart enough to do some research and admit it even if I'm likely to get a thumbs down for saying I had to look it up.
I've always love history and classic country has alot of history behind it. Getting to answer questions and read information about songs I like and don't know much about is kinda fun and interesting. Also, I don't much care for alot of the new stuff and have no interest in the ?s about it. That's why I go to country to find ?s about country, not rock, not blue grass, not gospel, not whatever.
I enjoy reading things about others' experience with the classic country music and interesting history behind. I also hate having to sort through all the Taylor Swift ?s just to find one about classic country music.
Yes, I think there should be a Classic Country Section..
If I knew how to get e-mail YA about this I would and you can even use my answer as back up for getting the section going.I'm sure others would say the same thing. The one's giving a thumbs down most likely only care about the newer stuff and think that it's all the same when truly it's not all the same.